AMD EPYC 9175F vs AMD EPYC 8324P

In this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD EPYC 9175F and the AMD EPYC 8324P and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the AMD EPYC 9175F 16 core processor released in Q4/2024 with the AMD EPYC 8324P which has 32 CPU cores and was introduced in Q3/2023.

The AMD EPYC 9175F is a 16 core processor with a clock frequency of 4.00 GHz. The processor can compute 32 threads at the same time. The AMD EPYC 8324P clocks with 2.65 GHz (3.00 GHz), has 32 CPU cores and can calculate 64 threads in parallel.

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Up to 6144 GB of memory in a maximum of 12 memory channels is supported by the AMD EPYC 9175F, while the AMD EPYC 8324P supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 230.4 GB/s enabled.

The AMD EPYC 9175F has a TDP of 320 W. The TDP of the AMD EPYC 8324P is 180 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

The AMD EPYC 9175F has 64.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 4 nm. The cache of AMD EPYC 8324P is at 128.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 5 nm.